MARTIN LUTHER SOUNDS LIKE HIS BRETHREN HE SUPPOSEDLY SEPARATED FROM (THE ROMAN CATHOLIC WHORE CHURCH).
SO WHAT DO WE HAVE? WE HAVE THE ROMANIST PREACHING UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT AND SALVATION
CONDITIONED ON THE SINNER, THEN WE HAVE THE ARMINIAN PREACHING UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT AND
SALVATION CONDITIONED ON THE SINNER, AND FINALLY WE HAVE THE TOLERANT CALVINIST, WHO PROFESSES
THE TRUTH, BUT WHEN EXAMINED, HE ALSO BELIEVES IN UNIVERSAL ATONEMENT AND SALVATION
CONDITIONED ON THE SINNER. ( SINCE HE REVEALS HIS TRUE FRUIT IN ALWAYS DEFENDING ARMINIANSM)
WE HAVE THEM ALL (ROMAN CATHOLIC PUPPETS) GOING FULL CIRCLE BACK TO ROME.
THIS WAS GOOD INFO. MARC!
2Co 11:13-15 For such ones are false apostles, deceitful workers transforming themselves into apostles of Christ.
And did not Satan marvelously transform himself into an angel of light? It is not a great thing, then, if also his ministers transform themselves as ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works.
FOR THE GLORY OF THE LORD ALONE!
Hi, Michael -
You're right! And it really brings this to the forefront: How much did the "Reformation" really "reform" itself from the Roman Catholic whore? It seems to me that it became a little bit more of a subtle version of salvation conditioned on the sinner. The "Reformers" didn't use Trent's language of works salvation; yet Luther's and Calvin's universal atonement were essentially the same thing! And today, as you say, it's going full circle back to Rome, even in "Calvinist" circles. The "New Auburn Theology" of people like Doug Wilson and Steve Schlissel (who claim to believe the doctrines of grace) is a good example. See
Yet, as you can see in these articles, the ones coming out against the "New Auburn Theology" are compromisers themselves! The RPCUS, who condemned this heresy, said, "We call upon the courts of the churches that are responsible for these men to institute judicial process against them and to vindicate the honor of Christ and the truth of the Christian Gospel by bringing judgment upon them, suspending them from office, and removing them from the communion of the church should they not repent." They should be removed from the communion of the church SHOULD THEY NOT REPENT? And what if they do "repent"? Does that show they were saved all along and just fell into some non-damnable heresy? The RPCUS won't even go so far as to say they are all unregenerate!!
It's just like John Robbins - he's so bold against "damnable" and "deadly" and "lethal" heresy, but he won't call all those who hold to this heresy unregenerate!
So the march to Rome continues, and even people who claim to be against it are marching right along with them.
E-mails, Forums, and Letters